<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Ways Social Media is Changing Traditional Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/</link>
	<description>Leave a mark.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 18:39:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Hulyk</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1634</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Hulyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-1634</guid>
		<description>Great post, Brandon.

Based on your excellent takeaways and from reading the comments above, I think that what we all value is a genuine interaction. Mostly, we are all seeking to establish TRUST.

Coming from a PR person&#039;s perspective, it&#039;s been huge for me to be able to talk to media online in order to create relationship - to get to know the person - so that the next time I call with a story idea, there&#039;s extra incentive to listen to what I have to say. It goes both ways. Social media, at first, is a little like testing the waters of face-to-face interaction. Based on the information you share and the insight you lend, others learn to classify you as one to pay attention to or not.

What it can evolve into is an incredible education tool and information giant. The idea that things can be shared in so many ways seems to parallel the advantages of different teaching styles. People are receiving and processing information faster than ever and at their convenience. There are no longer clear cut lines between content producers and receivers. As people start to realize that and take advantage of all the tools at their disposal, social media becomes that much more effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Brandon.</p>
<p>Based on your excellent takeaways and from reading the comments above, I think that what we all value is a genuine interaction. Mostly, we are all seeking to establish TRUST.</p>
<p>Coming from a PR person&#8217;s perspective, it&#8217;s been huge for me to be able to talk to media online in order to create relationship &#8211; to get to know the person &#8211; so that the next time I call with a story idea, there&#8217;s extra incentive to listen to what I have to say. It goes both ways. Social media, at first, is a little like testing the waters of face-to-face interaction. Based on the information you share and the insight you lend, others learn to classify you as one to pay attention to or not.</p>
<p>What it can evolve into is an incredible education tool and information giant. The idea that things can be shared in so many ways seems to parallel the advantages of different teaching styles. People are receiving and processing information faster than ever and at their convenience. There are no longer clear cut lines between content producers and receivers. As people start to realize that and take advantage of all the tools at their disposal, social media becomes that much more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Hulyk</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2108</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Hulyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-2108</guid>
		<description>Great post, Brandon.

Based on your excellent takeaways and from reading the comments above, I think that what we all value is a genuine interaction. Mostly, we are all seeking to establish TRUST.

Coming from a PR person&#039;s perspective, it&#039;s been huge for me to be able to talk to media online in order to create relationship - to get to know the person - so that the next time I call with a story idea, there&#039;s extra incentive to listen to what I have to say. It goes both ways. Social media, at first, is a little like testing the waters of face-to-face interaction. Based on the information you share and the insight you lend, others learn to classify you as one to pay attention to or not.

What it can evolve into is an incredible education tool and information giant. The idea that things can be shared in so many ways seems to parallel the advantages of different teaching styles. People are receiving and processing information faster than ever and at their convenience. There are no longer clear cut lines between content producers and receivers. As people start to realize that and take advantage of all the tools at their disposal, social media becomes that much more effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Brandon.</p>
<p>Based on your excellent takeaways and from reading the comments above, I think that what we all value is a genuine interaction. Mostly, we are all seeking to establish TRUST.</p>
<p>Coming from a PR person&#8217;s perspective, it&#8217;s been huge for me to be able to talk to media online in order to create relationship &#8211; to get to know the person &#8211; so that the next time I call with a story idea, there&#8217;s extra incentive to listen to what I have to say. It goes both ways. Social media, at first, is a little like testing the waters of face-to-face interaction. Based on the information you share and the insight you lend, others learn to classify you as one to pay attention to or not.</p>
<p>What it can evolve into is an incredible education tool and information giant. The idea that things can be shared in so many ways seems to parallel the advantages of different teaching styles. People are receiving and processing information faster than ever and at their convenience. There are no longer clear cut lines between content producers and receivers. As people start to realize that and take advantage of all the tools at their disposal, social media becomes that much more effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Clark</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>Tom-- Thanks for the kind words. One of the frustrations of my business has always been that it is a primarily one-way medium. 
By nature I like to talk TO people not AT them.  I&#039;m really enjoying breaking down that glass screen between us. 
I invite anyone with a Twitter account to join the conversation @sclarkwxyz.
Don&#039;t email me-- my inbox is choked with spam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom&#8211; Thanks for the kind words. One of the frustrations of my business has always been that it is a primarily one-way medium.<br />
By nature I like to talk TO people not AT them.  I&#8217;m really enjoying breaking down that glass screen between us.<br />
I invite anyone with a Twitter account to join the conversation @sclarkwxyz.<br />
Don&#8217;t email me&#8211; my inbox is choked with spam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Clark</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2107</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-2107</guid>
		<description>Tom-- Thanks for the kind words. One of the frustrations of my business has always been that it is a primarily one-way medium. 
By nature I like to talk TO people not AT them.  I&#039;m really enjoying breaking down that glass screen between us. 
I invite anyone with a Twitter account to join the conversation @sclarkwxyz.
Don&#039;t email me-- my inbox is choked with spam!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom&#8211; Thanks for the kind words. One of the frustrations of my business has always been that it is a primarily one-way medium.<br />
By nature I like to talk TO people not AT them.  I&#8217;m really enjoying breaking down that glass screen between us.<br />
I invite anyone with a Twitter account to join the conversation @sclarkwxyz.<br />
Don&#8217;t email me&#8211; my inbox is choked with spam!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention id tags » Four Ways Social Media is Changing Traditional Media -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1632</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention id tags » Four Ways Social Media is Changing Traditional Media -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-1632</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brandon Chesnutt and WXYZ Detroit. WXYZ Detroit said: RT @sclarkwxyz: @sclarkwxyz and @wxyzdetroit get mentions in @indentitypr blog (thanks@bchesnutt) http://bit.ly/9dCBS7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Brandon Chesnutt and WXYZ Detroit. WXYZ Detroit said: RT @sclarkwxyz: @sclarkwxyz and @wxyzdetroit get mentions in @indentitypr blog (thanks@bchesnutt) <a href="http://bit.ly/9dCBS7" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/9dCBS7</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki Stephan</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>Awesome points in this post, B. It&#039;s one thing to have an e-mail/phone relationship with a reporter, but I think it&#039;s great when you can extend that and start connecting online, as well. I&#039;m not sure if I would have ever had the chance to know some reporters/anchors as well as I do now if it weren&#039;t for Twitter. 

I hope more traditional media continue to see social networks not only as a means to find new stories, but also as a way to deepen connections with readers/viewers and PR pros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome points in this post, B. It&#8217;s one thing to have an e-mail/phone relationship with a reporter, but I think it&#8217;s great when you can extend that and start connecting online, as well. I&#8217;m not sure if I would have ever had the chance to know some reporters/anchors as well as I do now if it weren&#8217;t for Twitter. </p>
<p>I hope more traditional media continue to see social networks not only as a means to find new stories, but also as a way to deepen connections with readers/viewers and PR pros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikki Stephan</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>Awesome points in this post, B. It&#039;s one thing to have an e-mail/phone relationship with a reporter, but I think it&#039;s great when you can extend that and start connecting online, as well. I&#039;m not sure if I would have ever had the chance to know some reporters/anchors as well as I do now if it weren&#039;t for Twitter. 

I hope more traditional media continue to see social networks not only as a means to find new stories, but also as a way to deepen connections with readers/viewers and PR pros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome points in this post, B. It&#8217;s one thing to have an e-mail/phone relationship with a reporter, but I think it&#8217;s great when you can extend that and start connecting online, as well. I&#8217;m not sure if I would have ever had the chance to know some reporters/anchors as well as I do now if it weren&#8217;t for Twitter. </p>
<p>I hope more traditional media continue to see social networks not only as a means to find new stories, but also as a way to deepen connections with readers/viewers and PR pros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nixon</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1630</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-1630</guid>
		<description>The big one for me is your last point: making it personal. Since Stephen Clark seems to be big on confessions on his entertaining blog, allow me to make a confession: I used to be a Channel-7-only guy. But over the years, that affinity waned. By wife is a WDIV-er. And I succumb, from time to time, to the small-town folksiness of Fox-2. I grew to not have a preference, in other words, and I liked them all for different reasons.

Now I find myself gravitating back to Channel 7 with greater frequency. Why? One reason: I feel like I have a connection with the personality of the station, in the form of a connection with A personality FROM the station. Getting to know Stephen online has formed a new perception of someone I had previously only seen through the looking-(TV)-glass. I see humor. I see genuine-ness. I can relate to the personality in a way that wasn&#039;t previous possible. I&#039;ve yet to personally shake hands with him, but I feel like, in some small way, we know each other to a point...all through online interaction in public fora. 

As a result, I feel a stronger personal connection to his newscast and his station. And I want to, as you so often put it, do business with people I like. So Channel 7 gets my ratings point. And I really can&#039;t attribute that to anything other than an online but personal exposure to one of the station&#039;s anchors.

Strong agent of change, this Internet thingy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big one for me is your last point: making it personal. Since Stephen Clark seems to be big on confessions on his entertaining blog, allow me to make a confession: I used to be a Channel-7-only guy. But over the years, that affinity waned. By wife is a WDIV-er. And I succumb, from time to time, to the small-town folksiness of Fox-2. I grew to not have a preference, in other words, and I liked them all for different reasons.</p>
<p>Now I find myself gravitating back to Channel 7 with greater frequency. Why? One reason: I feel like I have a connection with the personality of the station, in the form of a connection with A personality FROM the station. Getting to know Stephen online has formed a new perception of someone I had previously only seen through the looking-(TV)-glass. I see humor. I see genuine-ness. I can relate to the personality in a way that wasn&#8217;t previous possible. I&#8217;ve yet to personally shake hands with him, but I feel like, in some small way, we know each other to a point&#8230;all through online interaction in public fora. </p>
<p>As a result, I feel a stronger personal connection to his newscast and his station. And I want to, as you so often put it, do business with people I like. So Channel 7 gets my ratings point. And I really can&#8217;t attribute that to anything other than an online but personal exposure to one of the station&#8217;s anchors.</p>
<p>Strong agent of change, this Internet thingy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Nixon</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2010/07/four-ways-social-media-is-changing-traditional-media/comment-page-1/#comment-2105</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nixon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=2681#comment-2105</guid>
		<description>The big one for me is your last point: making it personal. Since Stephen Clark seems to be big on confessions on his entertaining blog, allow me to make a confession: I used to be a Channel-7-only guy. But over the years, that affinity waned. By wife is a WDIV-er. And I succumb, from time to time, to the small-town folksiness of Fox-2. I grew to not have a preference, in other words, and I liked them all for different reasons.

Now I find myself gravitating back to Channel 7 with greater frequency. Why? One reason: I feel like I have a connection with the personality of the station, in the form of a connection with A personality FROM the station. Getting to know Stephen online has formed a new perception of someone I had previously only seen through the looking-(TV)-glass. I see humor. I see genuine-ness. I can relate to the personality in a way that wasn&#039;t previous possible. I&#039;ve yet to personally shake hands with him, but I feel like, in some small way, we know each other to a point...all through online interaction in public fora. 

As a result, I feel a stronger personal connection to his newscast and his station. And I want to, as you so often put it, do business with people I like. So Channel 7 gets my ratings point. And I really can&#039;t attribute that to anything other than an online but personal exposure to one of the station&#039;s anchors.

Strong agent of change, this Internet thingy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big one for me is your last point: making it personal. Since Stephen Clark seems to be big on confessions on his entertaining blog, allow me to make a confession: I used to be a Channel-7-only guy. But over the years, that affinity waned. By wife is a WDIV-er. And I succumb, from time to time, to the small-town folksiness of Fox-2. I grew to not have a preference, in other words, and I liked them all for different reasons.</p>
<p>Now I find myself gravitating back to Channel 7 with greater frequency. Why? One reason: I feel like I have a connection with the personality of the station, in the form of a connection with A personality FROM the station. Getting to know Stephen online has formed a new perception of someone I had previously only seen through the looking-(TV)-glass. I see humor. I see genuine-ness. I can relate to the personality in a way that wasn&#8217;t previous possible. I&#8217;ve yet to personally shake hands with him, but I feel like, in some small way, we know each other to a point&#8230;all through online interaction in public fora. </p>
<p>As a result, I feel a stronger personal connection to his newscast and his station. And I want to, as you so often put it, do business with people I like. So Channel 7 gets my ratings point. And I really can&#8217;t attribute that to anything other than an online but personal exposure to one of the station&#8217;s anchors.</p>
<p>Strong agent of change, this Internet thingy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

