<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ID Tags &#187; media spotlight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://identitypr.com/blog/tag/media-spotlight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://identitypr.com/blog</link>
	<description>Leave a mark.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Kim Kardashian Divorce: Is This Media Darling&#8217;s Brand Tarnished?</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2011/11/kim-kardashian-divorce-is-this-media-darlings-brand-tarnished/</link>
		<comments>http://identitypr.com/blog/2011/11/kim-kardashian-divorce-is-this-media-darlings-brand-tarnished/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Trapani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Good Morning America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joy Behar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keeping Up With the Kardashians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian. Kim Kardashian divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kris Jenner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=4910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://identitypr.com/blog/2011/11/kim-kardashian-divorce-is-this-media-darlings-brand-tarnished/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" src="http://identitypr.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/400px-Kim_Kardashian_2011-200x300.jpg" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="400px-Kim_Kardashian_2011" /></a>Keeping up with the Kardashians—how can you not?

This has been even easier to do since Kim announced her divorce after 72 days of marriage. The media spotlight has been the name of the family’s game lately—even more so than usual.

This entire situation further begs questions about the authenticity of this family. From a branding perspective, negative questions like, "Is Kim genuine?",  "Did she marry for love or money?", "Was the marriage all for the television spotlight?",  have definitely garnered more naysayers. With this post on her website, she tried to explain her actions to fans, but it's yet to be seen if this stunt will negatively impact her brand of perfumes, diet pills, clothing line or other endorsements. Will her beloved celebrity status fade as a result?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://identitypr.com/blog/2011/11/kim-kardashian-divorce-is-this-media-darlings-brand-tarnished/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Tiger Woods Immune to the Laws of PR?</title>
		<link>http://identitypr.com/blog/2009/11/is-tiger-woods-immune-to-the-laws-of-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://identitypr.com/blog/2009/11/is-tiger-woods-immune-to-the-laws-of-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 17:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Nixon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crisis management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crisis communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media spotlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negative press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://identitypr.com/blog/?p=1953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tiger Woods seems to be immune to a lot&#8230;the laws of physics, the laws of nature, age, the complacency letdown. However, local authorities&#8217; persistence would seem to indicate that he&#8217;s not immune to the laws of, well&#8230;laws. And is he even immune to the laws that govern public perception and ages-old conventional wisdom with respect [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://identitypr.com/blog/2009/11/is-tiger-woods-immune-to-the-laws-of-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

